🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising group of states are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this global conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.